Mayflower District Court
#area51woohoo-v-kozjani
This is the start of #area51woohoo-v-kozjani channel.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:56 p.m.
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-11 02:30 a.m. @krabz has added @huddy. to the case channel.
Case Modified
krabz 2025-03-11 02:30 a.m.
is yo plaintiff in the discord
krabz 2025-03-11 02:30 a.m.
yo client
krabzyo client
huddy. 2025-03-11 03:48 a.m.
He joining now
huddy. 2025-03-11 02:23 p.m.@krabz Joined
huddy. 2025-03-11 02:23 p.m.@songo
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-11 03:04 p.m. @krabz has added @songo to the case channel.
Case Modified
songo 2025-03-11 03:10 p.m.
yuh
ryan 2025-03-11 03:18 p.m.@huddy. Can you send your complaint here kind sir
ryanryan 2025-03-11 03:53 p.m.
Thanks
ryan 2025-03-12 10:56 a.m.@huddy. serve this and the complaint to the Plaintiff please
148.42 KB
ryan 2025-03-12 11:23 a.m.
dr
ryandr
huddy. 2025-03-12 12:11 p.m.
why sr
huddy. 2025-03-12 12:11 p.m.
dr*
ryan 2025-03-12 12:13 p.m.
I've been told it should be a disinterested party
ryan used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-12 01:59 p.m. @ryan has added @Brenda to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-03-12 03:22 p.m.
the government will not be defending or intervening in this matter. please see enclosed letter
@ryan @huddy. @Jani
huddy. 2025-03-12 03:24 p.m.
Well well well
ryan 2025-03-12 03:24 p.m. 
ryan 2025-03-12 03:25 p.m.
We'll wait for the process server to get here and proceed from there @huddy.
ryanWe'll wait for the process server to get here and proceed from there @huddy.
huddy. 2025-03-12 03:26 p.m.
What's the process server
ryan 2025-03-12 03:26 p.m.
The person who is serving process
ryan used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-12 03:31 p.m. @ryan has added @Jani to the case channel.
Case Modified
ryan 2025-03-12 03:31 p.m.
Ex parte comm disclosure !
ryan 2025-03-12 03:31 p.m.@Jani do you intend to retain private counsel
Jani 2025-03-12 03:32 p.m.
Hello
Jani 2025-03-12 03:32 p.m.
I am a counsel myself, but will also add a co to this.
ryan 2025-03-12 03:32 p.m.
Okay what's their name
Brendathe government will not be defending or intervening in this matter. please see enclosed letter @ryan @huddy. @Jani
Jani 2025-03-12 03:32 p.m.
Thanks for letting this court know the sg office is overloaded with cases
Jani 2025-03-12 03:33 p.m.
Wont disclose a name until I have his approval he will indeed be the co(edited)
ryan 2025-03-12 03:33 p.m.
Okay !
songo 2025-03-12 04:12 p.m.
Hi
Jani 2025-03-12 05:29 p.m.@huddy.
Jani 2025-03-12 05:29 p.m.
Are you intending to enter in more evidence once the discovery period has opened?
huddy. 2025-03-12 05:46 p.m.
We’ll see.
Jani 2025-03-12 05:46 p.m.
That's a no.
Jani 2025-03-12 05:46 p.m.
Thanks.
Jani 2025-03-12 06:58 p.m.@ryan We can continue
Jani 2025-03-12 06:58 p.m.
I will let you know asap if a co will appear y / n
ryan 2025-03-12 07:14 p.m.
Awesome
ryan 2025-03-12 07:14 p.m.@Jani please have a responsive pleading by end of day (CDT) 3/16
Jani 2025-03-12 07:17 p.m.
Alright.
ryan used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-12 08:32 p.m. @ryan has added @nathanh111 to the case channel.
Case Modified
Jani 2025-03-12 08:32 p.m.
ty
songo 2025-03-12 08:47 p.m.
huddy. 2025-03-13 01:26 p.m.@ryan Can we have a pretrial discovery timeframe?
ryan 2025-03-13 02:16 p.m.
No
ryan 2025-03-13 02:16 p.m.
You may wait until the responsive pleading
huddy. 2025-03-13 02:28 p.m.
Oh mb thought he already submitted that
huddy. 2025-03-13 02:28 p.m.
What's his timeframe on that?
ryanryan 2025-03-13 02:28 p.m.
Here
huddy. 2025-03-13 02:28 p.m.
Thanks, I'm blind
ryan 2025-03-13 02:28 p.m.
After that we'll be chilling
ryan 2025-03-13 02:28 p.m.
No ur fine
Jani 2025-03-15 08:17 p.m.
CC: @huddy. @ryan @nathanh111
ryanAfter that we'll be chilling
Jani 2025-03-15 08:18 p.m.
Whenever ready we can open discovery.
ryan 2025-03-15 08:55 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-03-15 08:55 p.m.@huddy. 36 hrs to submit
ryan 2025-03-15 08:55 p.m.@Jani 18 hours after that
Jani 2025-03-15 09:02 p.m.@ryan maybe you can use a timestamp that selects everyone their timezone automatically so we can expect when certain deadlines are ending
Jani 2025-03-15 09:02 p.m.
Keeps us all in check : )
ryan 2025-03-15 09:10 p.m.
I am not tech savvy.
Jani 2025-03-15 09:12 p.m.
Alrighty
huddy. 2025-03-16 07:10 a.m.@Jani @ryan
ryan 2025-03-16 07:37 a.m.@huddy. What is Ms Brenda an expert in?
ryanhuddy. 2025-03-16 07:38 a.m.
Madam Brenda is an expert in use of force guidelines and justice department procedures. We wish to call on her to talk more about this, if you would so allow this to be referred to/brought up at trial.
huddy.Madam Brenda is an expert in use of force guidelines and justice department procedures. We wish to call on her to talk more about this, if you would so allow this to be referred to...
ryan 2025-03-16 07:39 a.m.
I will leave @Jani to talk about this
ryan 2025-03-16 07:40 a.m.
If you have any comment that is
Jani 2025-03-16 07:40 a.m.
I object to it, the relevance of the case could only be received from witnesses that were there, the court is the expert in this case.
Jani 2025-03-16 07:40 a.m.
We do not need a third party to examine the evidence of presented within this court, the plaintiff will examine, the defense will examine and then after the court will hear, examine and order.
Jani 2025-03-16 07:41 a.m.
Please maintain the list of witnesses to be actually individuals who have truly witnessed this.
Jani 2025-03-16 07:41 a.m.
I urge the court to order the counsel to re file his discovery.
Jani 2025-03-16 07:41 a.m.
Thanks
Jani 2025-03-16 07:44 a.m.
To add to it, we are dealing here with a civil case, not a criminal procedure.
Jani 2025-03-16 07:44 a.m.
If that wasn’t already known.
huddy. 2025-03-16 07:50 a.m.
The Solicitor General’s Office is not a “third party” in the sense that Kozjani suggests. Their decision not to represent Kozjani is not a witness statement but an official legal determination based on a review of the evidence and applicable law. This is directly relevant to the case because it supports the argument that Kozjani’s actions were beyond the bounds of lawful conduct.
Furthermore, the court may take judicial notice of official government determinations regarding the conduct of government employees. The SGO’s letter is an official document from a legal authority, and it directly addresses the issue before the court—whether Kozjani’s actions were justified. Kozjani argues that only eyewitnesses can be used to establish the facts, but this letter is not merely a factual account; it is an expert legal determination by the SGO who have a lot of expert standing.
Furthermore, the court may take judicial notice of official government determinations regarding the conduct of government employees. The SGO’s letter is an official document from a legal authority, and it directly addresses the issue before the court—whether Kozjani’s actions were justified. Kozjani argues that only eyewitnesses can be used to establish the facts, but this letter is not merely a factual account; it is an expert legal determination by the SGO who have a lot of expert standing.
huddy. 2025-03-16 07:52 a.m.
I point you towards Federal Law Rule 803(8)(A)(iii) (factual findings from a legally authorized investigation are authorised and not hearsay) and Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, 488 U.S. 153 (1988) in which the Court held that factual findings in public records, including opinions and conclusions, are admissible under Rule 803(8) as long as they are based on a factual investigation and the report is deemed trustworthy.
huddy. 2025-03-16 07:53 a.m.
I think it's safe to say that the SGO is a trustworthy and expert source.
huddy. 2025-03-16 07:53 a.m.
And have conducted their own investigation.
huddy.I think it's safe to say that the SGO is a trustworthy and expert source.
ryan 2025-03-16 07:53 a.m.
We would need Ms Popplewell to testify to that
ryan 2025-03-16 07:55 a.m.@Jani if you'd like to disqualify this witness, I would suggest a formal motion and voir dire. I do believe that, at this time, that the letter is facially relevant, so I will admit it pending the presentation of the Plaintiff's case. If, at this time, it becomes more prejudicial or irrelevant, I won't hesitate to strike it.
ryanWe would need Ms Popplewell to testify to that
huddy. 2025-03-16 07:56 a.m.
Agreed
ryan 2025-03-16 07:57 a.m.
I will, however, stay the closing of discovery if Mr Kozjani wishes to voir dire the witness
Jani 2025-03-16 08:05 a.m.
The Solicitor General’s Office declining to represent me does not constitute an investigative finding. Their decision was based on workload constraints rather than any factual or legal determination regarding my case. It is improper to equate administrative capacity issues with an investigative conclusion, and any attempt to use this as substantive evidence would be misleading and prejudicial.
Moreover, the opposition's reliance on the Solicitor General’s decision, rather than an actual investigation or witness with direct knowledge, demonstrates factual bias. Without an inquiry into the circumstances, it is inappropriate to treat an administrative decision as an evidentiary substitute for a properly conducted factual examination.
I respectfully object to the inclusion of Brenda as a witness in this matter on the grounds that she does not meet the necessary qualifications to provide relevant testimony. The fundamental purpose of witness testimony is to present factual accounts of events based on personal knowledge and direct observation. However, Brenda was not present at the events in question and therefore cannot offer any firsthand knowledge regarding the facts of the case.
do mention that they have had no sights of what had truly happened, exactly the same with how the plaintiff is now reliant just on a 18 second video which does not contain any context.
The purpose of discovery is to obtain relevant, admissible evidence—not speculative or secondhand accounts. Given these clear limitations, it is absurd that a formal motion is even necessary to exclude a plainly unqualified witness.
Nevertheless, in the interest of judicial efficiency and in compliance with the court’s directive, the defense will file a motion to strike.
Moreover, the opposition's reliance on the Solicitor General’s decision, rather than an actual investigation or witness with direct knowledge, demonstrates factual bias. Without an inquiry into the circumstances, it is inappropriate to treat an administrative decision as an evidentiary substitute for a properly conducted factual examination.
I respectfully object to the inclusion of Brenda as a witness in this matter on the grounds that she does not meet the necessary qualifications to provide relevant testimony. The fundamental purpose of witness testimony is to present factual accounts of events based on personal knowledge and direct observation. However, Brenda was not present at the events in question and therefore cannot offer any firsthand knowledge regarding the facts of the case.
do mention that they have had no sights of what had truly happened, exactly the same with how the plaintiff is now reliant just on a 18 second video which does not contain any context.
The purpose of discovery is to obtain relevant, admissible evidence—not speculative or secondhand accounts. Given these clear limitations, it is absurd that a formal motion is even necessary to exclude a plainly unqualified witness.
Nevertheless, in the interest of judicial efficiency and in compliance with the court’s directive, the defense will file a motion to strike.
Jani 2025-03-16 08:07 a.m.@ryan when would you like this to be filed at latest?
JaniThe Solicitor General’s Office declining to represent me does not constitute an investigative finding. Their decision was based on workload constraints rather than any factual or l...
huddy. 2025-03-16 08:12 a.m.
Their decision was not based on workload constraints - this is a baseless and quite frankly disgusting accusation that the Justice Department holds has no integrity and does not uphold the law, and this accusation has absolutely no evidence to support it.
We are not reliant on the decision, we are using it in addition to our case.
Your argument that Brenda was not present is simply invalid because that's not the point of an expert witness.
We are not reliant on the decision, we are using it in addition to our case.
Your argument that Brenda was not present is simply invalid because that's not the point of an expert witness.
huddy.Their decision was not based on workload constraints - this is a baseless and quite frankly disgusting accusation that the Justice Department holds has no integrity and does not up...
Jani 2025-03-16 08:20 a.m.
To also mention, the Solicitor General’s Office (SGO) is not an investigative body, nor does it function as a fact-finding authority in legal disputes. Its role is strictly limited to providing legal representation to government officials in certain cases, based on internal policies, resource availability, and strategic priorities.
A refusal by the SGO to represent an individual does not imply any wrongdoing or liability. Such a decision is often based on workload constraints, administrative considerations, or policy guidelines, rather than any substantive review of the case's merits. It is not an investigative finding, nor does it carry any weight as evidence of misconduct.
Since the (DoJ) had offered their representation and then retracted it when I, the Defendant was told they are '' overloaded '' with cases. For you the Plaintiff to then argue with me how I am speculating in regards to what has been said to me is a baseless reach into the unknown. The statements are clear—there was no investigative determination, only an administrative decision regarding workload. Or do you wish to speculate any further?
Additionally, calling a Deputy Solicitor General who has only been on the job for a singleday an "expert" would be an outrageous claim. Expertise is built on experience, legal acumen, and a proven track record, none of which can be reasonably attributed to someone with mere hours in the position.
For the plaintiff's counsel to believe that the Deputy Solicitor General would actually bring any meaningful insight into the 18-second video, wherein she was not present, is nothing more than a baseless reach. This is mere speculation, hoping it would somehow support the plaintiff’s case when, in reality, it adds no factual or evidentiary value.
A refusal by the SGO to represent an individual does not imply any wrongdoing or liability. Such a decision is often based on workload constraints, administrative considerations, or policy guidelines, rather than any substantive review of the case's merits. It is not an investigative finding, nor does it carry any weight as evidence of misconduct.
Since the (DoJ) had offered their representation and then retracted it when I, the Defendant was told they are '' overloaded '' with cases. For you the Plaintiff to then argue with me how I am speculating in regards to what has been said to me is a baseless reach into the unknown. The statements are clear—there was no investigative determination, only an administrative decision regarding workload. Or do you wish to speculate any further?
Additionally, calling a Deputy Solicitor General who has only been on the job for a single
For the plaintiff's counsel to believe that the Deputy Solicitor General would actually bring any meaningful insight into the 18-second video, wherein she was not present, is nothing more than a baseless reach. This is mere speculation, hoping it would somehow support the plaintiff’s case when, in reality, it adds no factual or evidentiary value.
Jani 2025-03-16 08:21 a.m.
Now, let’s not fill this chat with endless back-and-forth comments. Instead, we will patiently wait until the defense has issued this court a motion to strike.
Jani 2025-03-16 08:21 a.m.@ryan When would you like this to be filed, Your Honor?
huddy. 2025-03-16 08:26 a.m. 
Jani 2025-03-16 08:26 a.m.
I didnt know you could just send screenshots in this case?
Jani 2025-03-16 08:31 a.m.
You know, it is understandable that you are trying everything as a counselor, given that the evidence submitted in discovery not too long ago shows nothing but the last 18 (EIGHTEEN) seconds of a much larger picture—one that the plaintiff cannot shape for this court. Attempting to rely on this incomplete fragment, without context, only further proves the lack of substantive evidence to support the plaintiff’s claims. The plaintiff was asked, "Are you going to submit any other evidence?", the response was, "We'll see."
Are you truly here to prove a case, counsel, or do you simply wish to argue back and forth with me?
Are you truly here to prove a case, counsel, or do you simply wish to argue back and forth with me?
Jani 2025-03-16 08:31 a.m.
Now I need to go have lunch with my family, wish to say anything else?
huddy. 2025-03-16 08:37 a.m.
I appreciate you telling me something you asked me, telling me something I responded and providing absolutely no relevance or commentary in the most random ass statement 
huddy. 2025-03-16 08:37 a.m.
Your arguments are invalid
huddy. 2025-03-16 08:37 a.m.
And I’ll keep my observations of you to myself.
Jani 2025-03-16 08:37 a.m.
Alright Hamilton
Jani 2025-03-16 08:38 a.m.
It is a joke to you.
Jani 2025-03-16 08:38 a.m.
Gday
Janiryan 2025-03-16 12:04 p.m.
Within 3 days pls
ryan 2025-03-16 12:04 p.m.
So we can properly dispose of the matter
Jani 2025-03-16 01:37 p.m.
Jani 2025-03-18 05:08 p.m.@ryan expect it today
ryan 2025-03-18 05:09 p.m.
I sit ready
nathanh111 2025-03-18 05:09 p.m.
Hi everybody!
nathanh111 2025-03-18 05:09 p.m.
Happy Tuesday!
nathanh111Hi everybody!
ryan 2025-03-18 05:10 p.m.
Why are you in this channel ?!
nathanh111 2025-03-18 05:10 p.m.
Uhm did you not see my NOA
nathanh111 2025-03-18 05:10 p.m.
I thought u were the one who added me @ryan
ryan 2025-03-18 05:12 p.m.
Hmmm
nathanh111Uhm did you not see my NOA
ryan 2025-03-18 05:12 p.m.
Which sude
ryan 2025-03-18 05:12 p.m.
Side
nathanh111 2025-03-18 05:12 p.m.
Wow
nathanh111 2025-03-18 05:12 p.m.
I represent only the innocent
nathanh111 2025-03-18 05:12 p.m.
And the falsely accused
nathanh111 2025-03-18 05:12 p.m.
Aka the Defendant
ryanI sit ready
Jani 2025-03-18 05:15 p.m.
bless
Jani 2025-03-18 05:15 p.m.
ty Your Honor.
ryan 2025-03-18 05:19 p.m.
Thank you
nathanh111I represent only the innocent
ryan 2025-03-18 05:19 p.m.
I remember now
huddy. 2025-03-18 05:21 p.m.
Nice
huddy.Nice
ryan 2025-03-18 05:37 p.m.
48 hours
ryan 2025-03-18 05:37 p.m.
to reply
Jani 2025-03-18 06:27 p.m.
CC: @ryan @nathanh111 @huddy. (edited)
183.52 KB
nathanh111Happy Tuesday!
songo 2025-03-18 07:54 p.m.
songo 2025-03-18 07:54 p.m.
hi
huddy. 2025-03-20 12:43 p.m.
Sorry I suck at formatting
huddy. 2025-03-20 12:43 p.m.@ryan @Jani
Jani 2025-03-20 12:44 p.m.
huddy. 2025-03-20 12:46 p.m.
I was trying to incorporate cool looking bullet points which don't abide by google docs formatting
Jani 2025-03-20 01:18 p.m.@ryan when do you wish for my response to this?
ryan 2025-03-20 01:24 p.m.
No replies
ryan 2025-03-20 01:24 p.m.
Unless I look at it and see it necessary
ryan 2025-03-20 01:24 p.m.
Haven't looked yet
Jani 2025-03-20 01:27 p.m.
I see a blank page mostly,
Jani 2025-03-20 01:28 p.m.
And I see speculative statements made that I would like to mention to this court.
Jani 2025-03-20 01:28 p.m.
Let me know.
songo 2025-03-20 02:30 p.m.
Jani 2025-03-20 02:32 p.m. 
Jani 2025-03-20 02:32 p.m.
If it wasn’t already mentioned a trillion times.
huddy. 2025-03-20 02:33 p.m.on behalf of the Clark County Sheriff's Office
huddy. 2025-03-20 02:33 p.m.
Ain't nobody talking about CCSO
Jani 2025-03-20 02:39 p.m.
Did you read after or?
Jani 2025-03-20 02:39 p.m.
If it wasnt already known either I am a Lieutenant in CCSO
Jani 2025-03-20 02:40 p.m.
You realise that this letter isn’t a piece of evidence for you to use around, you keep mentioning it, but leaving the best part out is kind of embarrassing.
huddy. 2025-03-20 02:49 p.m.
Right, I haven’t claimed the falsehood of that statement or contradicted it
Jani 2025-03-20 02:51 p.m.
good boy
Jani 2025-03-20 02:59 p.m.
I do want to mention where you went wrong James.
Jani 2025-03-20 03:01 p.m.
You argue that the SGO's office conducted a legal assessment of the actions and that it's refusal to pro representation was based on a determination of misconduct, this is incorrect. The SGO is not an investigative body and does not conduct formal legal determinations regarding liability. As previously stated in the SGO’s own letter, their declination of representation is not an admission of liability. So here you are misleading the court.
Janigood boy
huddy. 2025-03-20 03:01 p.m.
Excuse me?
huddy. 2025-03-20 03:02 p.m.
I will respond to this when I am home.
Jani 2025-03-20 03:02 p.m.
To continue on the case law you cited, Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, 488 U.S. 153 (1988).
arguing that official reports containing conclusions are admissible if they are trustworthy. However, the SGO’s declination letter is not a factual investigative report but an administrative decision. Beech Aircraft applies to official investigative reports, not discretionary administrative decisions.
arguing that official reports containing conclusions are admissible if they are trustworthy. However, the SGO’s declination letter is not a factual investigative report but an administrative decision. Beech Aircraft applies to official investigative reports, not discretionary administrative decisions.
Jani 2025-03-20 03:04 p.m.
It kind of shocks me that whenever I suggest for an impartial investigator, the plaintiff believes this is not needed. arguing that the SGO’s “review” was sufficient. The SGO did not conduct an investigation, nor does it have the legal authority to do so. A truly impartial expert witness or investigator would provide a more reliable and fair assessment rather than relying on an administrative declination.
Jani 2025-03-20 03:06 p.m.
I believe you have said enough random stuff that don't make sense in your paper, now time for the Judge to rule on it.
Jani 2025-03-20 03:08 p.m.@ryan
ryan 2025-03-20 04:12 p.m.
Grrrrrrrr
huddy. 2025-03-25 02:20 p.m.@ryan Hello
ryan 2025-03-28 12:16 a.m.
hai
ryan 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
this will be taken care of tmr afternoon
ryan 2025-03-29 07:20 p.m.
okay
ryan 2025-03-29 07:21 p.m.@Jani @huddy. its ur turn guys
ryan 2025-03-29 07:40 p.m.@Jani @huddy.
ryan 2025-03-29 07:40 p.m.
We're going to hold a hearing
ryan 2025-03-29 07:40 p.m.
on the admissibility of ms popplewell
Jani 2025-03-29 07:40 p.m.
Between ?
ryan 2025-03-29 07:40 p.m.
unless anyone has any objections
Jani 2025-03-29 07:42 p.m.
You want to hear us give our statements again or?
ryan 2025-03-29 07:44 p.m.
Nah nvm
ryan 2025-03-29 07:44 p.m.
We were gonna examine Popplewell
ryan 2025-03-29 07:44 p.m.
Decided against
Jani 2025-03-29 07:45 p.m.
Okay
Jani 2025-03-29 07:45 p.m.
so now?
ryan 2025-03-29 08:09 p.m.
I write
Jani 2025-03-29 08:25 p.m.
you write
Jani 2025-03-29 08:25 p.m.
we wait
Jani 2025-03-29 08:25 p.m.
grazie
ryanDecided against
huddy. 2025-03-30 03:54 p.m.
Decided against examining her or her
huddy.Decided against examining her or her
ryan 2025-03-30 04:02 p.m.
Voir dire of the expert
huddy. 2025-03-30 04:02 p.m.
Ok
ryan 2025-03-31 11:15 p.m.
be so fr
ryan 2025-03-31 11:15 p.m.
this will be done by wednesday night
songo 2025-04-03 11:53 a.m.
The king of procrastination
songoThe king of procrastination
ryan 2025-04-03 01:50 p.m.
ryan 2025-04-03 01:56 p.m.
gotta disclose ex parte
ryan 2025-04-03 01:56 p.m.@Jani @huddy.
Jani Server2025-04-03 01:57 p.m.
Jani 2025-04-03 01:57 p.m.
Mine too
Jani 2025-04-03 01:57 p.m.
Lets not rush this dude, he got more cases @songo
JaniLets not rush this dude, he got more cases @songo
songo 2025-04-03 02:01 p.m.
I jest
songo 2025-04-03 02:01 p.m.
I'm not being serious
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:02 p.m.
More cases where he equally does nothing
UserMessage could not be loaded.
ryan 2025-04-03 02:27 p.m.
ryan 2025-04-03 02:27 p.m.
this was meant to be pasted here
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:38 p.m.
Yep cuz I'm the one that has pinged you or spammed you in a single case and not respected that whatsoever
ryanClick to see attachment.
Jani 2025-04-03 02:38 p.m.
Lmao thats true
huddy.More cases where he equally does nothing
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:38 p.m.
this is like the only thing ive ever said and its just a bland comment added to someone elses complaint
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:38 p.m.
ive been the most respectful and patient guy
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:38 p.m.
you show me where ive pinged you once or dmd you begging for a ruling
Jani 2025-04-03 02:38 p.m.
Mike ross of the civil suits
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:39 p.m.
sorry trevor evans
huddy.Yep cuz I'm the one that has pinged you or spammed you in a single case and not respected that whatsoever
ryan 2025-04-03 02:39 p.m.
I dislike BST lawyers
Jani 2025-04-03 02:39 p.m.
ryan 2025-04-03 02:39 p.m.
Based on their timezone
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:39 p.m.
I dislike BST people
ryan 2025-04-03 02:39 p.m.
I concur
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:39 p.m.
and BST people probably hate BST people
Jani 2025-04-03 02:40 p.m.
James can you like not fight with every judge in every case you are involved in?
ryan 2025-04-03 02:40 p.m.
Grrr
ryan 2025-04-03 02:40 p.m.
JamesMHamilton to 10,000 hours contempt
Jani 2025-04-03 02:40 p.m.
Its so ordered
JaniJames can you like not fight with every judge in every case you are involved in?
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:40 p.m.
stfu kid aint no one speaking to you, aint no one asked you to stir up random shit
Jani 2025-04-03 02:40 p.m.
How did I do? 
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:41 p.m.
what an argument
huddy.stfu kid aint no one speaking to you, aint no one asked you to stir up random shit
Jani 2025-04-03 02:41 p.m.
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:41 p.m.
like literally if im concurring and joking with someone and you come along and say 'can you not fight with him'
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:41 p.m.
bro is not him
huddy.stfu kid aint no one speaking to you, aint no one asked you to stir up random shit
ryan 2025-04-03 02:41 p.m.
Woah OKAY
ryan 2025-04-03 02:41 p.m.
No
Jani 2025-04-03 02:41 p.m.
Such a sensitive guy
ryan 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
You will not use such words in my court !
ryan 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
You will apologize 
Jani 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
I motion for contempt
ryan 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
Nah he's chilling
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
Apologise for what
ryan 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
just dont swear or clutter the channel pls
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
how is someone gonna really ragebait me and expect me not to get ragebaited
ryanjust dont swear or clutter the channel pls
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
stfu = Stay Thoughtful, Friendly, and Understanding
ryan 2025-04-03 02:42 p.m.
No.
ryan 2025-04-03 02:43 p.m.
Not the way you intended
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:43 p.m.
ok sorry sir you got me
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:43 p.m.
Share The Fun, Unwind is what i really meant
Jani 2025-04-03 02:43 p.m.
YOU KID!!!!!!
ryan 2025-04-03 02:43 p.m.
Do not misbehave in this Court as an officer of it.
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:43 p.m.
me if chatgpt didnt exist
Jani 2025-04-03 02:43 p.m.
back to the kitchen mr george
Jani 2025-04-03 02:43 p.m.
ima cook up my next ragebait
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:44 p.m.
i will never learn not to be ragebaited
ryan 2025-04-03 02:45 p.m.
If you get ragebaited again, I will find you in contempt
ryan 2025-04-03 02:45 p.m.
and levy a fine of $5,000
ryan 2025-04-03 02:45 p.m.
That said... @Jani do NOT ragebait opposing counsel
Jani 2025-04-03 02:46 p.m.
Yes SIR ! 
ryanIf you get ragebaited again, I will find you in contempt
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:59 p.m.
Sir it's a mental disorder
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:59 p.m.
I am schizophrenic and retarded
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:59 p.m.
I ask that the court take this into consideration
ryan 2025-04-03 02:59 p.m.
Do not misbehave in front of this Court.
huddy. 2025-04-03 03:01 p.m.
Apologies, will forward to my therapist at nUSA shady acres
huddy.I am schizophrenic and retarded
songo 2025-04-03 09:55 p.m.
Is this really the lawyer I picked
Jani 2025-04-04 12:31 a.m.
Yup
JaniYup
songo 2025-04-04 11:46 p.m.
I hit the jackpot bro
songo 2025-04-04 11:46 p.m.
he's got a silver tongue!
Jani 2025-04-05 07:43 p.m.
He claims to be mayflowers finest(edited)
Jani 2025-04-05 07:44 p.m.
Self issued status
huddy. 2025-04-06 03:12 a.m.
Thank you for your random ahh comments which are failing to rage bait me or receive attention on your behalf, which you are so desperate for.
Jani 2025-04-06 05:09 a.m.
What
ryan 2025-04-06 12:05 p.m.
Ruling today ???!
Jani 2025-04-06 12:05 p.m.
Inshalla
Jani 2025-04-06 12:06 p.m.
Wouldnt a MTD sound better?
Jani 2025-04-06 12:06 p.m.
ryan 2025-04-06 12:06 p.m.
i spent a LONG time procrastinating on this mid ahh ruling
Jani 2025-04-06 12:07 p.m.
Ngl this case has been going on for too long, mtd based on that james is mayflowers finest
Jani 2025-04-06 12:12 p.m.
Ima see if I have time today to write one up.
Jani 2025-04-06 12:12 p.m.
Let you know Judge.
Jani 2025-04-06 12:12 p.m.
Enjoy the day fellas.
ryan 2025-04-06 12:13 p.m.@ryan @Jani @huddy.
ryan 2025-04-06 12:14 p.m.
Witness excluded
ryan 2025-04-06 12:14 p.m.
Jani 2025-04-06 12:22 p.m.
Thank you, Your Honor
ryani spent a LONG time procrastinating on this mid ahh ruling
Jani 2025-04-06 12:24 p.m.
Ngl its good
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:25 p.m.
Are you joking
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:25 p.m.
We've spent weeks waiting for a ruling on that random ahh unimportant request
Jani 2025-04-06 12:26 p.m.
WATCH OUT EVERYONE HE WILL FLIP
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:26 p.m.
Can we move to trial now
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:26 p.m.
and not focus on futile matters
Jani 2025-04-06 12:28 p.m.
It would most likely then he next week
Jani 2025-04-06 12:28 p.m.
Be*
Jani 2025-04-06 12:29 p.m.
Since I am fully occupied this week because im leaving the country.
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:29 p.m.
Lovely
Jani 2025-04-06 12:30 p.m.
Lol
Jani 2025-04-06 12:37 p.m.@ryan somewhere next week alr?
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:41 p.m.
Somewhere?
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:41 p.m.
Hong Kong?
Jani 2025-04-06 12:42 p.m.
Jani 2025-04-06 12:43 p.m.
Jani 2025-04-06 12:43 p.m.
Jani 2025-04-06 12:43 p.m.
Aaaaandd breath.
Jani 2025-04-06 12:43 p.m.
Did it work James?
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:44 p.m.
I feel the need to alert the court of a 100% guaranteed working method to get free robux
Jani 2025-04-06 12:47 p.m.@songo ngl he lost his mind(edited)
Jani 2025-04-06 12:47 p.m.
You should have gotten another attorney
Janihuddy. 2025-04-06 01:24 p.m.
Sir just because you don't want 1,000,000 robux, don't make others miss out on the opportunity
JaniYou should have gotten another attorney
songo 2025-04-06 01:59 p.m.
I don't know what you're talking about
Jani 2025-04-06 02:05 p.m.
good
ryan 2025-04-06 02:05 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-06 02:05 p.m.
So
ryan 2025-04-06 02:05 p.m.
Are there any other concerns for pretrial
Jani 2025-04-06 02:05 p.m.
Do you still accept motions?
ryan 2025-04-06 02:05 p.m.
Since i took so long
ryan 2025-04-06 02:05 p.m.
we'll extend motions by 48 hours
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
Right
Jani 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
Suuuiii
Jani 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
Like I had already said, if we wish to plan pre trial
Jani 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
lets do it sometime next week alr?
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
?
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
Why does pre trial need to be delayed another week
ryan 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
more than likely
ryan 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
it doesnt
ryan 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
We'll extend it 4 more days total
Jani 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
Cause I am going out of the country.
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:06 p.m.
Because you go on holiday, you can't submit a document listing yourself as a witness and pasting a link to a video?
ryan 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
he already did that
ryan 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
if youll recall
ryan 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
you goober
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
We've already had discovery?
ryan 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
Yes James
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
Oh cool
ryan 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
what do you think this motion was about??
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
Then what r we waiiting for
Jani 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
brother
Jani 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
are you on this planet?
ryanwhat do you think this motion was about??
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.
a most magestic of woman
ryan 2025-04-06 02:07 p.m.@Jani do you have a motion to submit
ryan 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
Brenda is a guy.
Janiare you on this planet?
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
nah im living on the planet where i get a million a month to handle 10000000 cases and i cant remember whats happened in each one
Jani 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
Considering doing so, you gave us 48 hrs to do so. If you wont receive one consider me not to have one.
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
What motions are there
huddy.nah im living on the planet where i get a million a month to handle 10000000 cases and i cant remember whats happened in each one
Jani 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
You do that to yourself
ryan 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
Well i dont want to extend
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
You have a MTD?
ryan 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
if u dont have time
ryan 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
What will the motion be
Jani 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
No one is telling you to help these money hungry individuals
JaniYou do that to yourself
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:08 p.m.
Nah bro donald trump makes me do it
JaniNo one is telling you to help these money hungry individuals
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:09 p.m.
Money hungry? Bros family is simply seeking compensation for your heinous murder
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:09 p.m.@Jani Do you have a MTD?
Jani 2025-04-06 02:09 p.m.
Let's keep the accusations for yourself counselor.
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:09 p.m.
to yourself*
ryan 2025-04-06 02:09 p.m.
Omg
huddy.a most magestic of woman
songo 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
Clearly his taste in women is the same as his taste in fashion. Only the best. With just the right amount of dirty.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
You too are like an old married couple
ryan 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
Stop this bickering
ryanYou too are like an old married couple
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
you say that in every case im in
ryanYou too are like an old married couple
songo 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
this is too troo
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
?order
Jani 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
ninja catches a fight in every case
huddy.you say that in every case im in
ryan 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
Because you bicker in every single case
ryan 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
Because you have no class
Jani 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
^^
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
I simply respond to ragebait how I am expected to
huddy.I simply respond to ragebait how I am expected to
ryanBecause you have no class
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:10 p.m.
The only class I got is class a drugs in my bedside drawer sir
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.@Jani Do you have a MTD?
ryan 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
What motion would you submit @Jani
songo 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
Legalize Nopy
huddy.ryan 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
Stop asking him counselor
Jani 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
Im still considering some facts, will let you know in due time.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
Youre cluttering this channel while adding nothing
Jani 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
Ive got 48 hrs correct?
ryan 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
If you have a motion sure
Jani 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
if I dont submit within those, then consider I dont have one.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
Okay
Jani 2025-04-06 02:11 p.m.
Thank you.
Jani 2025-04-06 02:12 p.m.
Then after those 48hrs, please do consider this case going into a recess.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:12 p.m.
Why a recess?
Jani 2025-04-06 02:13 p.m.
Because I will be gone from 10th up to the 13th, back home on the 14th.
songo 2025-04-06 02:13 p.m.
delayed status
ryan 2025-04-06 02:13 p.m.
Oh my god
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:13 p.m.
You can't hire an attorney?
Jani 2025-04-06 02:13 p.m.
I have to be gone for family funeral purposes.
JaniBecause I will be gone from 10th up to the 13th, back home on the 14th.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:13 p.m.@nathanh111 will have to cover you
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
I understand your circumstances and sympathize, but I cannot have this case delayed when you have cocounsel
Jani 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
He isn't alive.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
We'll see
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
if he responds no recess
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
if he doesnt then sure
Jani 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
I urge the court to consider, as we are in fucking roblox
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
I know I know
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
I neglected yall for like two weeks
Jani 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
So from the damn 15th and onwards
Jani 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
we can do the trial
Jani 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
it aint that hard
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
But if you have co counsel I do not care
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
Unless your co counsel is dead
Jani 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
Co counsel is dead mate.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:14 p.m.
then host another funeral
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:15 p.m.
Plaintiff, a dear associate of roblox, condemns Defense counsel for his heinous use of profanity against Plaintiff's associate.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:15 p.m.
You are full of hot air
ryan 2025-04-06 02:15 p.m.
My lord
Jani 2025-04-06 02:15 p.m.
pimple popper
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:15 p.m.
Alright so are we waiting another 3 weeks for a trial so this man can go on holiday
Jani 2025-04-06 02:16 p.m.
Are you an imbecile or what?
huddy.Alright so are we waiting another 3 weeks for a trial so this man can go on holiday
ryan 2025-04-06 02:16 p.m.
Erm actually it'd be a week and a half
JaniAre you an imbecile or what?
ryan 2025-04-06 02:16 p.m.
I do not allow james to be rude, you do not get to either.
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:16 p.m.
Or is Defendant going to cast his choice upon a selection of one of the 210 attorneys that exist within this state
Jani 2025-04-06 02:16 p.m.
Holiday, I just mentioned a funeral.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:16 p.m.
Heres the plan
Jani 2025-04-06 02:16 p.m.
I am an attorney myself, representing myself would mean no cost.
ryanErm actually it'd be a week and a half
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:16 p.m.
a week and a half of pain and uncertainty in Plaintiff's family
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
his widow
Jani 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
Who would I hire '' mayflower civil case finest '' to defend me for roblox money
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
abandoned
ryan 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
Pre-trial concludes in 96 hours:
1. 48 for motions
2. 48 for reply
3. Recess until@Jani is back
We will promptly begin trial
1. 48 for motions
2. 48 for reply
3. Recess until
We will promptly begin trial
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
'promptly'
ryan 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
Watch your next words
Jani 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
Thank you, Your Honor.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
Both of you
ryan 2025-04-06 02:17 p.m.
I am sick and tired of you clogging channels with useless crap
Jani 2025-04-06 02:18 p.m.
lol I said ty
Jani 2025-04-06 02:18 p.m.
Anyways, good day fellas.
ryan 2025-04-06 02:18 p.m.
From now on, any irrelevant messages or sly remarks will be met with contempt !
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:18 p.m.
Thank you greatly, your ronour
Janilol I said ty
ryan 2025-04-06 02:18 p.m.
That wasn't directed at you specifically or that message
Jani 2025-04-06 02:18 p.m.
Copy that
Jani 2025-04-06 02:29 p.m.@ryan 
huddy. 2025-04-06 02:30 p.m. 
ryannathanh111 2025-04-06 02:34 p.m.
Is it ok if I touch you your honor?
songo 2025-04-06 02:35 p.m.
nathanh111 2025-04-06 02:35 p.m.
I do ask you grant the recess, I joined this case back when I had time to give to this game
nathanh111 2025-04-06 02:35 p.m.
But I have a full time job now post grad and really can’t dedicate anytime to this case
nathanh111 2025-04-06 02:35 p.m.
(Free my client he is innocent)
nathanh111I do ask you grant the recess, I joined this case back when I had time to give to this game
songo 2025-04-06 02:35 p.m.
mood!
nathanh111I do ask you grant the recess, I joined this case back when I had time to give to this game
Jani 2025-04-06 02:40 p.m.
It is already granted, thank you Musician.
Jani 2025-04-09 03:37 p.m.@ryan
Jani 2025-04-09 03:38 p.m.
an unanymous complaint was filed to the IA department of the CCSO, with the same exhibit filed by the Plaintiff in this case.
Jani 2025-04-09 03:38 p.m.
anonymous*
Jani 2025-04-09 03:39 p.m.
I believe the complaint came from the plaintiff, since I don't know who else would have filed it, but I can not know since it was anonymous.
Jani 2025-04-09 03:39 p.m.
If you'd like I can paste the case report in here
Jani 2025-04-09 03:39 p.m.
Would you like that Your Honor?
huddy. 2025-04-09 03:53 p.m.
1. Evidence is publicly available as per the discovery document on the trello, as well as the video having been seen in public channels as people possibly spread it, which isn't surprising considering that it was such a shocking incident.
2. Why would an Internal Affairs report made against you have anything to do with this case?
2. Why would an Internal Affairs report made against you have anything to do with this case?
Jani 2025-04-09 03:54 p.m.
Well since it is the same evidence, thats why it has to do with this case.
Jani 2025-04-09 03:54 p.m.
Considering it was anonymous, and I do not want to speculate. I do have my suspicion that it might have come from the plaintiff.
Jani 2025-04-09 03:55 p.m.
Do you speak to your client often?
Jani 2025-04-09 03:55 p.m.
I got investigated for two days until they just now send my case report.
ryan 2025-04-09 03:56 p.m.
Sorry was taking a COVID test
ryan 2025-04-09 03:56 p.m.
What's happening
Jani 2025-04-09 03:56 p.m.
Your Honor,
I do not know who the complainant was in this instance, maybe you can contact the Internal Affairs department yourself to find that out.
I do not know who the complainant was in this instance, maybe you can contact the Internal Affairs department yourself to find that out.
Jani 2025-04-09 03:56 p.m.
I was investigated for the Exhibit posted by the plaintiff
Jani 2025-04-09 03:56 p.m.
Investigated by the IA of the CCSO.
ryan 2025-04-09 03:57 p.m.
I do concur (sadly) with james here
ryan 2025-04-09 03:57 p.m.
It is a protected right to file an IA report
Jani 2025-04-09 03:57 p.m.
I realise that..
Jani 2025-04-09 03:57 p.m.
that isn't my question lol
ryan 2025-04-09 03:58 p.m.
Okay then what can i do for you
Jani 2025-04-09 03:58 p.m.
I just now received the result of the investigation.
Jani 2025-04-09 03:58 p.m.
I want to share the case report with this case chat
Jani 2025-04-09 03:58 p.m.
and all people in it.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:00 p.m.
I got permission from IA to share this document, if you wish to contact the investigator he is listed on the document.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:00 p.m.
How would that be relevant? CCSO Internal Affairs' decision is not a court ruling - the case here will be reviewed by the Judge and he will make a ruling based on our trial, the Internal Affairs folks make their own department decision based on their reviewal of the evidence - the two should not be correlated as the Internal Affairs leads are not expert Judges who have a complex understanding of legal burdens and arguments... They are just there to see if you violated department policy. This case isn't alleging violations of department policy, this is a civil case in which we are alleging torts.
JaniI got permission from IA to share this document, if you wish to contact the investigator he is listed on the document.
ryan 2025-04-09 04:00 p.m.
As an offer of proof?
ryan 2025-04-09 04:00 p.m.
Of something
Jani 2025-04-09 04:01 p.m.
Im gonna post it, james is already crying.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:01 p.m.
Lord have mercy
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:01 p.m.
I fail to understand the relevance? You were found guilty/found not guilty of an alleged violation of department policy. What has that got to do with the torts or arguments made within this case?
Jani 2025-04-09 04:01 p.m.CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INTERNAL AFFAIRS BUREAU Disciplinary Action Report | Investigation Case CCSO-IA-117-25 Section I - Case General Information Investigator Username: IronicalScript Investigator’s Rank: Sergeant Date of... 
Jani 2025-04-09 04:01 p.m.@ryan @huddy. Go ahead fellas.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:01 p.m.
You are not being sued for anything to do with department policy, therefore a judgement made by IA regarding your possible breach of department policy has absolutely no relevance.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:02 p.m.
Someone filed a complaint on me, now I am sharing this document with the Court.
ryan 2025-04-09 04:02 p.m.
Are you using this as discoverable material
Janihuddy. 2025-04-09 04:02 p.m.
Thank you so much counsellor. I am really glad to witness a document stating that you are not guilty of breaking department policy of no relevance to the torts alleged. This is very helpful!
Jani 2025-04-09 04:02 p.m.
If you grant me, then yes I would like to admit this into the discovery of me.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:02 p.m.
This is abominable - explain what possible relevance this could have for it to be admitted into the discovery...
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m."I believe No Disciplinary Action should be distributed to Lieutenant Kozjani, I find his actions in no violation of the Department’s COC or SOP"
ryan 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Or an offer of proof
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
This case has absolutely nothing to do with CCSO COC or SOP.
huddy.This case has absolutely nothing to do with CCSO COC or SOP.
ryan 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Well you tried to admit Brenda
Jani 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Ryan can you control this guy?
ryanWell you tried to admit Brenda
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Exactly
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
And that was denied
ryan 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Under similar logic
Jani 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Please so I can normally talk to you.
huddy.And that was denied
ryan 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Because she's not an expert
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
This is even more absurd than Brenda
ryan 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
On CCSO policy
ryan 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Actually less
ryan 2025-04-09 04:03 p.m.
Id suggest
Jani 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
James you realise this complaint was made on me, and I got investigated by an expert investigator.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
This case is not alleging any violations of CCSO policy which is completely irrelevant here
ryan 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
But shut up for a second place
ryan 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Please
ryan 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.@huddy.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Lord.
ryan 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Just for a second
ryan 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Stop typing
Jani 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Can not even say one word before this dude explodes.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Your Honor.
ryan 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.@Jani are you using this as discoverable material/an offer of proof
Jani 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Yes please.
ryan 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Okay
Jani 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
I believe this would be highly relevant to the case.
ryan 2025-04-09 04:04 p.m.
Now it's james turn
ryan 2025-04-09 04:05 p.m.@huddy. Now let's hear your objection
Jani 2025-04-09 04:05 p.m.
He just wrote 1000 messages.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:06 p.m.@ryan This was even in my Motion, so he listened but it overturned for him (if he was the complainant) 
Jani 2025-04-09 04:08 p.m.
I don't understand whenever a true expert investigator investigation report is to be admitted into the discovery he makes the biggest drama about it to not let it be placed in, but whenhe wanted Brenda, that is not an expert, nor an investigator as ruled by this court, it was of no issue.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:09 p.m.
Guess what, what brenda wrote is also about the COC and SOP of our Department, something the plaintiff wanted to admit.
Let's look at facts people iso false hopeJames
Let's look at facts people iso false hope
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:12 p.m.
It is completely irrelevant. The investigator did not find him clear of the torts alleged nor even discussed them. The investigator was simply reviewing a possible violation of department policy. According to the investigator, the Defendant was not guilty of violating a department policy. That has absolutely nothing to do with this case, as nowhere have we alleged a violation of department policy.
Furthermore, the Internal Affairs investigator is not a Judge. He does not have an expert legal knowledge of burdens of any torts that are being alleged in this case. This report being submitted as evidence is completely irrelevant as the investigator did not have any legal precedent nor reviewed past judgements or legal arguments as that is not the capacity that he was ruling in.
The report states:"Lieutenant Kozjani claims that the complainant has been recklessly driving and crashed into his vehicle multiple times before the beginning of the video that was submitted. Lieutenant Kozjani says that he decided to use Lethal Force as he feared that the complainant would continue recklessly driving and possibly put other pedestrians in danger" . So just because Kozjani alleges these claims, they are legally justifiable and truthful arguments? Even hypothetical evidence that would show the Plaintiff crashing his vehicle multiple times would not provide a sound argument for deploying lethal force - that is a complex topic that must be reviewed under trial by expert legal minds based on precedent and other legal statutes; the investigator did not review any of that and simply heard the argument and decided it was justifiable, without any legal brain in mind. Therefore, his judgement is completely irrelevant and invalid as he is not expected to, nor qualified to, make official legal judgements on the same gravity as a Judge, in a court.
Defendant continues to claim that 'it was of no issue' to present Brenda and keeps dropping the Brenda argument, but Brenda was literally denied for similar reason that this should be denied.
Also, dropping my name in italics whilst trying to sound like severus snape spitting out a name of somebody he dislikes, is not slick.
Furthermore, the Internal Affairs investigator is not a Judge. He does not have an expert legal knowledge of burdens of any torts that are being alleged in this case. This report being submitted as evidence is completely irrelevant as the investigator did not have any legal precedent nor reviewed past judgements or legal arguments as that is not the capacity that he was ruling in.
The report states:
Defendant continues to claim that 'it was of no issue' to present Brenda and keeps dropping the Brenda argument, but Brenda was literally denied for similar reason that this should be denied.
Also, dropping my name in italics whilst trying to sound like severus snape spitting out a name of somebody he dislikes, is not slick.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:15 p.m.
All the document shows is that an Internal Affairs investigator, who is not under duty to review complex lethal-force cases from a legal perspective based on past precedent and other burdens, found Kozjani not guilty of breaching department policy based on statements made by him. The investigator is not qualified to make expert rulings on complex matters that should be reasonably considered in court, and whether or not Kozjani broke department policy is completely irrelevant...
Jani 2025-04-09 04:16 p.m.
It is worth noting the inconsistency in the Plaintiff’s position. When Mr. B. Popplewell previously authored a letter containing unverified allegations of violations of the Code of Conduct (COC) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), the Plaintiff was eager to submit that letter and the testimony into evidence and portray it as significant. Now, however, when a formal, impartial investigation conducted by a trained Internal Affairs investigator, an individual tasked specifically with evaluating compliance with departmental rules ESPECIALLY IN USE OF FORCE / MISUSE OF FORCE concludes that no violation of COC or SOP occurred, and that conclusion is further validated by the signature and approval of the Chief Deputy, the Plaintiff seeks to exclude it on the grounds of relevance.
This inconsistency is telling. It demonstrates a selective view of what is deemed "relevant" favoring unofficial accusations while attempting to suppress the findings of a professional, unbiased investigation. The IA report is not only factually relevant but materially important, as it directly contradicts the narrative that Plaintiff seeks to advance. It affirms that the Defendant acted within the bounds of departmental policy and procedure, a key issue in evaluating the reasonableness of the Defendant’s conduct.
This inconsistency is telling. It demonstrates a selective view of what is deemed "relevant" favoring unofficial accusations while attempting to suppress the findings of a professional, unbiased investigation. The IA report is not only factually relevant but materially important, as it directly contradicts the narrative that Plaintiff seeks to advance. It affirms that the Defendant acted within the bounds of departmental policy and procedure, a key issue in evaluating the reasonableness of the Defendant’s conduct.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:17 p.m.
Who cares what Plaintiff was eager to do? Brenda was denied, and the Plaintiff agrees with the court's sound decision. Thus, similar burdens should be applied to the irrelevance of this absurd document
Jani 2025-04-09 04:17 p.m.
For the Plaintiff to seek unofficial accusations while rejecting official, documented findings is not only illogical. it undermines the integrity of this case and suggests a deliberate effort to manipulate the narrative rather than pursue the truth.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:18 p.m.
You agreed with the court?
Jani 2025-04-09 04:18 p.m.
Dear Counsel, you almost put your underwear inside out.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:18 p.m.
Out of anger.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:19 p.m.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:20 p.m.@ryan
I respectfully urge the Court to prioritize the pursuit of factual truth in this matter and this Internal Affairs report is precisely that: a verified, impartial fact. The Plaintiff should not be permitted to speak against the truth while simultaneously promoting unsupported claims; such tactics obstruct the fair administration of justice.
I respectfully urge the Court to prioritize the pursuit of factual truth in this matter and this Internal Affairs report is precisely that: a verified, impartial fact. The Plaintiff should not be permitted to speak against the truth while simultaneously promoting unsupported claims; such tactics obstruct the fair administration of justice.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:21 p.m.
Let's cut the nonsense James, honestly.
huddy.Are you joking
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:23 p.m.
A verified fact? What fact? That you didn't violate department policy? The word department policy hasn't been used or alleged once in this case... If an investigator who does not take into consideration any legal precedent or arguments, as a court does, says that Defendant didn't break department policy (which is irrelevant as we never claimed he did or didn't, this case is about completely different torts), based on an interview with Kozjani in which he made some claims, this is suddenly admissable? Would you also like Plaintiff's dental hygene reports stating that he has fully abided by and not violated hospital policy?
Jani 2025-04-09 04:24 p.m.
You realise that he looked at your evidence, you submitted.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:24 p.m.
So you want to say that your piece of evidence shows not misuse of force?
Jani 2025-04-09 04:24 p.m.
No*
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:24 p.m.@ryan The fact that for such a complex case, in which use of lethal force is questioned and such an extended list of supreme court rulings, all contradicting eachother, exists, one singular paragraph is dropped in this document which describes the actions which led the investigator to make the decision?
Jani 2025-04-09 04:25 p.m.
Honest to God, take a walk in the park. Refresh that mind of yours and come back with a clear head.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:25 p.m.
Since you aren't thinking straight.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:25 p.m.
Let me ask you this.
JaniLet's cut the nonsense James, honestly.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:25 p.m.
'Cut the nonsense James'
The Plaintiff should not be permitted to speak against the truth while simultaneously promoting unsupported claims. For the Plaintiff to seek unofficial accusations while rejecting official, documented findings is not only illogical.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:25 p.m.
Did you, or Area51 file this complaint to the IA department of the CCSO?
Jani 2025-04-09 04:25 p.m.
Yes or no question.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:26 p.m.
Aren't you meant to be on holiday or something
Jani 2025-04-09 04:26 p.m.
Either you answer this now, or I will just do it when you are on the bench.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:26 p.m.
Can you stop ragebaiting me and just let the Judge read our arguments
Jani 2025-04-09 04:26 p.m.
So no answer?
JaniEither you answer this now, or I will just do it when you are on the bench.
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:27 p.m.
Well that's very kind and insightful of you to assume that one day I will become a Judge!
Jani 2025-04-09 04:27 p.m.
Bench in the gallery.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:27 p.m.
Or the Doggy Bench
Jani 2025-04-09 04:27 p.m.
Or the Bench in the park outside of the Courthouse.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:27 p.m.
but a Judge, with that attitude and anger problems?
huddy.Well that's very kind and insightful of you to assume that one day I will become a Judge!
Jani 2025-04-09 04:28 p.m.
Diverting from answering my question, very smart mr Counsel man.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:28 p.m.
I'd take that as a yes.
Janibut a Judge, with that attitude and anger problems?
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:28 p.m.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:29 p.m.@ryan So it seems the Plaintiff did indeed file an Internal Affairs complaint, which is good (I encouraged an expert investigator to investigate into this as mentioned in the motion)
huddy. 2025-04-09 04:30 p.m.
Yep it seems the Plaintiff did indeed file an Internal Affairs complaint, because the Plaintiff Counsel hasn't responded to Kozjani's illegitimate question which hasn't officially been asked by the Judge and Plaintiff counsel wants to maintain his integrity in not being forced to answer illegitimate questions asked by somebody with some severe problems.
Jani 2025-04-09 04:31 p.m.
Dude is being ragebaited by ghosts, it aint me lol
ryan 2025-04-09 05:22 p.m.
God forbid i have a positive covid test
ryan 2025-04-09 05:23 p.m.
Maybe yall will get speedy rulings after all
huddy.It is completely irrelevant. The investigator did not find him clear of the torts alleged nor even discussed them. The investigator was simply reviewing a possible violation of dep...
ryan 2025-04-09 05:26 p.m.
Brenda was denied because someone who was one day on the job making a purely administrative decision is not an expert
ryan 2025-04-09 05:28 p.m.
I will be allowing this evidence as it would tend to prove some fact
ryan 2025-04-09 05:29 p.m.
It is relevant, unprejudicial and nonculmulative
Jani 2025-04-09 06:28 p.m.
Thank you.
ryanGod forbid i have a positive covid test
Jani 2025-04-09 06:33 p.m.
You will be fine, dont worry
ryan 2025-04-09 06:33 p.m.
I'm aware
ryanI will be allowing this evidence as it would tend to prove some fact
huddy. 2025-04-10 04:20 a.m.
Could you expand upon what fact?
huddy. 2025-04-11 03:22 p.m.@ryan
ryan 2025-04-12 02:31 p.m.
Liability
ryan 2025-04-12 02:32 p.m.
Defendant's evidence comes from a verified finder of fact who specializes in CCSO policy which will give us insight into the supposed wrongfulness
ryanDefendant's evidence comes from a verified finder of fact who specializes in CCSO policy which will give us insight into the supposed wrongfulness
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:34 p.m.
What supposed wrongfulness? We are accusing him of wrongful death, not of violating CCSO policy
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:34 p.m.
And if Defendant can magically add this to his discovery then may we add the investigator as a witness to ours?
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
Since he's such an expert in summarising one of the most complex lethal force issues in America in two sentences and has produced such expert material for us to review
ryan 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
Counselor
ryan 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
Brenda Popplewell
ryan 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
Is not an investigator
ryan 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
Is not an expert
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
Neither is Lebron James
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
I am not arguing about Brenda
ryan 2025-04-12 02:35 p.m.
In my ruling i said it'd be difficult if we had someone like IA
ryan 2025-04-12 02:36 p.m.
That they'd be admissible
ryan 2025-04-12 02:36 p.m.
Look what we have
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:36 p.m.
Right, so allow me to question him on the stand then
ryan 2025-04-12 02:36 p.m.
No one says you won't be able to?
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:37 p.m.
I shall repeat myself; may we add him to our discovery or will we automatically be given a chance to question him?
ryan 2025-04-12 02:46 p.m.
Okay a few things
ryan 2025-04-12 02:47 p.m.
1) you're not repeating yourself
2) if you want to voir dire the witness we can do that during trial
3) Kozjani is calling him as a witness so you get to cross examine
4) discovery amendments are closed at this point
2) if you want to voir dire the witness we can do that during trial
3) Kozjani is calling him as a witness so you get to cross examine
4) discovery amendments are closed at this point
ryan 2025-04-12 02:47 p.m.@huddy.
huddy.And if Defendant can magically add this to his discovery then may we add the investigator as a witness to ours?
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:57 p.m.
Ahem
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:57 p.m.
Anyway number 3 is perfect
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:57 p.m.
Thank you for informing me of this
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:57 p.m.
Please let me know when you need me to submit a time to schedule trial
ryan 2025-04-12 03:04 p.m.
Before we admit his testimony anyway
ryan 2025-04-12 03:04 p.m.
We'll voir dire him
huddy. 2025-04-18 10:23 a.m.@ryan When is this going to happen?
songo 2025-04-23 10:41 a.m.
why is this delayed so much
ryan 2025-04-23 02:08 p.m.
A myriad of reasons
ryan 2025-04-23 02:08 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-23 02:08 p.m.@Jani you failed to submit a motion
ryan 2025-04-23 02:08 p.m.
Let's start trial scheduling
ryan 2025-04-23 02:15 p.m.@huddy.
ryanhuddy. 2025-04-23 02:16 p.m.
I am available this Saturday
ryan 2025-04-23 02:16 p.m.
That would be unfavorable until about 1p CDT
huddy. 2025-04-23 02:16 p.m.
I am available this Sunday
ryan 2025-04-23 02:17 p.m.
That would be fine
ryan 2025-04-23 02:17 p.m.@Jani
Jani 2025-04-23 03:37 p.m.
MO/TUE would work for me.
Jani 2025-04-23 03:37 p.m.
Those are my off days.
songo 2025-04-24 10:34 a.m.
JaniMO/TUE would work for me.
ryan 2025-04-25 12:55 a.m.
How do we feel about monday @huddy.
ryan 2025-04-25 12:56 a.m.
I would be free after 6p bst
songo 2025-04-26 12:37 a.m.
I'm open almost all day Monday my boy(edited)
songo 2025-04-26 12:38 a.m.@huddy. LAWYER
songo 2025-04-26 12:38 a.m.
ANSWER THE JUDGE
huddy. 2025-04-26 04:20 a.m.
Yurr
ryan 2025-04-27 11:06 a.m.@Jani
Jani 2025-04-27 11:07 a.m.
Suggest times
Jani 2025-04-27 11:07 a.m.
Then I say y/n
ryan 2025-04-27 11:18 a.m.
We did
ryanI would be free after 6p bst
ryan 2025-04-27 11:18 a.m.@Jani
Jani 2025-04-27 11:18 a.m.
What timezone is that
Jani 2025-04-27 11:18 a.m.
Let me check
ryan 2025-04-27 11:19 a.m.
-1 from you
ryan 2025-04-27 11:19 a.m.
I think
songo 2025-04-29 01:49 p.m. 
songo 2025-04-30 11:49 a.m. 
ryan 2025-05-01 09:17 p.m.@Jani
ryan 2025-05-01 09:17 p.m.
Wait
ryan 2025-05-01 09:17 p.m.
Kozjani is European
ryan 2025-05-02 07:18 p.m.@Jani from the time of this message you have 7 days to make known if you are still with us both in game and on this Earth.
ryan 2025-05-02 07:18 p.m.
A reaction, reply, or message will suffice
ryan 2025-05-02 07:18 p.m.
Your time will end 5/10 at 00:00 CDT
ryanWait
Jani 2025-05-03 07:23 a.m.
messaging at 3 am
Jani 2025-05-03 07:24 a.m.
Really do not have time, we'd have to wait so I can find a moment in my time to spend it on roblox for a kid sueing me.
Jani 2025-05-03 07:25 a.m.
We really hit rock bottom when an 18 second video would cause all of this mess and me having to show up to defend myself.
Jani 2025-05-03 07:25 a.m.
18 second video that shows nothing but reckless and dangerous behavior by the plaintiff(edited)
Jani 2025-05-03 07:26 a.m.@ryan What days are you avail this week.
songo 2025-05-03 03:54 p.m.
Nah it really just feels like you're delaying it so you don't have to deal with it
songo 2025-05-03 03:55 p.m.
You've been openly salty about it the entire time
songo 2025-05-03 03:55 p.m.
just a hunch tho... not a legal ststement......
Jani 2025-05-03 04:21 p.m.
So I dont have to deal with it?
Jani 2025-05-03 04:22 p.m.
Idk if you have followed your own case but we have had two big rulings already and both ruled in my favor.
Jani 2025-05-03 04:22 p.m.
You think I wouldnt want to continue something when it is going good for a party?
Jani 2025-05-03 04:23 p.m.
You realise how much time I have to put into this just because you believe I was wrong, when you are there playing the game like you dont care mate and just would do the same thing over and over again. Your records say it all.
Jani 2025-05-03 04:24 p.m.
You just salty and wish to have it easy like you had it with the other cop who did not show up.
songo 2025-05-03 04:24 p.m.
We elected a senator that was an ex-terrorist
Jani 2025-05-03 04:24 p.m.
Then we have your counsel who takes on such case cause he aint better then his own client. All ingame money pleasure
Jani 2025-05-03 04:25 p.m.
Honest, stupidity to the max
songo 2025-05-03 04:25 p.m.
Does he know
songo 2025-05-03 04:25 p.m.
or is it bait
.....
.....
Jani 2025-05-03 04:26 p.m.
The blind leading the blind
songo 2025-05-03 04:26 p.m.
How poetic kozjani
songo 2025-05-03 04:26 p.m.
how about you channel that into your case
songo 2025-05-03 04:26 p.m.
clearly you have enough time to reply to this
Jani 2025-05-03 04:27 p.m.
I encourage you to do the bar exam and become a roblox attorney
Jani 2025-05-03 04:27 p.m.
You’d love it.
songo 2025-05-03 04:27 p.m.
Pass
Jani 2025-05-03 04:27 p.m.
Intelligence matter.
songo 2025-05-03 04:27 p.m.
I bet it takes a lot of intellect to become a roblox attorney
Jani 2025-05-03 04:28 p.m.
It doesn’t, but it is these cases that take the pleasure of practicing away. Since it is a waste of time.
Jani 2025-05-03 04:29 p.m.
Im awaiting the agenda of the judge.
Jani 2025-05-03 04:29 p.m.
So I can see if I have time to fill this in.
songo 2025-05-03 04:31 p.m.
You have all the energy to type up a storm and go to war right here but not enough to actually progress it so that it ends sooner
Jani 2025-05-03 04:31 p.m.
Are you good in the head or?
Jani 2025-05-03 04:32 p.m.
2 UCD so you can go get a clark burger, stop waisting everyones time.
songo 2025-05-03 04:32 p.m.
I'm sure the non-waste of time cases where you are in the right are going great my good sir.
Jani 2025-05-03 04:32 p.m.
I am in the right.
songo 2025-05-03 04:33 p.m.
Because there's just so many different kinds of legal cases in this game
Jani 2025-05-03 04:33 p.m.
Up until now I dont think you are on the winning streak.
Jani 2025-05-03 04:33 p.m.
But we will see in the end.
Jani 2025-05-03 04:33 p.m.
Goodnight
songo 2025-05-03 04:34 p.m.
Farewell I hope you find the time to deal with this sooner
songo 2025-05-03 04:34 p.m.
It's been getting dragged out for awhile
Jani 2025-05-03 04:34 p.m.
Boo hoo, we will find time.
Janiryan 2025-05-03 08:00 p.m.
Hardly any, it's finals week
Jani 2025-05-04 12:13 p.m.
Alright.
songo 2025-05-06 11:27 a.m.
Geeked up playing roblox all day
adlithestevenson 2025-06-01 11:19 p.m.
Okay
adlithestevenson 2025-06-01 11:19 p.m.@Jani
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 07:27 p.m.
Are you still with us
songo 2025-06-02 08:21 p.m.
game is gonna die b4 this case is over brah
Jani 2025-06-05 12:09 p.m.
Bro thinks case money was promised to him 3000 years ago
huddy. 2025-06-05 12:57 p.m.@adlithestevenson Your Honor
huddy. 2025-06-05 12:57 p.m.
With all due respect
huddy. 2025-06-05 12:57 p.m.
This needs to get moving ASAP
huddy. 2025-06-05 12:57 p.m.
I doubt Defendant is still on holiday
huddy. 2025-06-05 12:57 p.m.
after 4 years
Jani 2025-06-05 12:58 p.m.
Im not on holiday
Jani 2025-06-05 12:58 p.m.
I just dont play the game
Jani 2025-06-05 12:58 p.m.
How abt I make this easy, file for a motion to dismiss this crap, should have done that months ago
Jani 2025-06-05 12:58 p.m.
and we all enjoy our lives again.
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:20 p.m.
You've been enjoying it for seven months
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:20 p.m.
You committed a heinous crime
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:20 p.m.
you aren't getting away from it that easily
Jani 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.
hahahahahahha
Jani 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.
Sleepy joe woke up
Jani 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.@adlithestevenson Want my motion today so you can rule on it?
Jani 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.
Today I have time.
Jani 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.
1 hour left
huddy.You committed a heinous crime
Janiryan 2025-06-06 02:16 a.m.
I wanted your motion ages ago.
ryan 2025-06-06 02:18 a.m.
You'll be filing nothing
ryan 2025-06-06 02:18 a.m.
We'll start trial immediately.
ryan 2025-06-06 02:19 a.m.@huddy. @songo @Jani Okay let's put our avaliability for the next few days here
ryan 2025-06-06 02:19 a.m.
Kozjani no bullshit where you tell us to give you time, you are to be productive and proactive
songo 2025-06-06 02:21 a.m.
I should be free whenever
songo 2025-06-06 02:22 a.m.
Actually no I'm working tomorrow, but besides that my next few days should be open
ryan 2025-06-06 02:24 a.m.
I concur
ryan 2025-06-06 02:24 a.m.
How does saturday sound? @songo
songo 2025-06-06 02:24 a.m.
Good to me
ryan 2025-06-06 02:24 a.m.
What time
songo 2025-06-06 02:26 a.m.
It's a day off for me so just @ me and I should be fine so long as I'm not doing errands. Any time between 11am-11pm would be great
huddy. 2025-06-06 06:14 a.m.
saturday sounds good to me yehaw
nathanh111 2025-06-06 12:39 p.m.@Jani hi
songo 2025-06-07 06:54 p.m.
sup I'm free
huddy. 2025-06-08 06:23 a.m.
same
songo 2025-06-09 07:20 p.m.
soooooo typical.............
songo 2025-06-09 07:21 p.m.@Jani wake yo ass up cause it's time to go beast mode
ryan 2025-06-18 01:25 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-06-18 01:25 p.m.@Jani please respond within 24 hours
ryan 2025-06-19 02:41 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-06-19 02:41 p.m.@Jani you are found in direct criminal contempt of this Court
ryan 2025-06-19 02:41 p.m.
You are to pay a fine of $10,000 and serve 180 minutes in the county jail
ryan 2025-06-20 12:11 a.m.
This will continue each day you fail to respond.
Jani 2025-06-20 05:07 p.m. 
ryanYou are to pay a fine of $10,000 and serve 180 minutes in the county jail
Jani 2025-06-20 05:10 p.m. 
ryan 2025-06-20 05:13 p.m.
That'll be another fine and jail time
ryan 2025-06-20 05:13 p.m.
* for failure to reply a 2nd day
ryan 2025-06-20 05:13 p.m.
Are you ready to proceed
Jani 2025-06-20 05:14 p.m.
Jani 2025-06-20 05:15 p.m.
Ryan with all due respect, I dont play this game anymore.
Jani 2025-06-20 05:15 p.m.
you guys are waisting your time.
Jani 2025-06-20 05:15 p.m.
Motion for judgment
JaniMotion for judgment
ryan 2025-06-20 05:19 p.m.
Okay do you want to change your plea to liable then
Jani 2025-06-20 05:19 p.m.
I aint liable.
Jani 2025-06-20 05:20 p.m.
can you or can you not
ryan 2025-06-20 05:20 p.m.
Well the only way out of this you for is to fight it or concede
ryan 2025-06-20 05:20 p.m.
To concede is to say you're liable
Jani 2025-06-20 05:20 p.m.
bro said concede
Jani 2025-06-20 05:20 p.m.
lmao
ryan 2025-06-20 05:20 p.m.
Uhm yea that's lexically what it is?
Jani 2025-06-20 05:21 p.m.
Ryan, Isnt there a motion for judgment?
Jani 2025-06-20 05:21 p.m.
If this court would have used their brains
ryan 2025-06-20 05:21 p.m.
Not from the defense no
Jani 2025-06-20 05:21 p.m.
and seen the 18 second clip from that teenager
ryan 2025-06-20 05:21 p.m.
At this point you've exhausted pretrial motions
Jani 2025-06-20 05:21 p.m.
At this point you are dragging it
Jani 2025-06-20 05:22 p.m.
im telling you to make a judgment
JaniAt this point you are dragging it
ryan 2025-06-20 05:22 p.m.
Rightfully so
Jani 2025-06-20 05:22 p.m.
based on the cracky 18 second clip of the lil gooner
ryan 2025-06-20 05:22 p.m.
Okay that judgment will be against you
Jani 2025-06-20 05:22 p.m.
It wont.
Jani 2025-06-20 05:22 p.m.
Since you will have to actually review the evidence and make a judgment
Jani 2025-06-20 05:23 p.m.
'' A motion for judgment in a civil case is a request for the court to issue a decision, either before or after a trial, based on the legal sufficiency of the evidence presented. It's a procedural device used to resolve a case or narrow down the issues in dispute. ''
Jani 2025-06-20 05:23 p.m.
this would be the fasted way for all.
ryan 2025-06-20 05:23 p.m.
Okay well
ryan 2025-06-20 05:23 p.m.
Denied
ryan 2025-06-20 05:23 p.m.
Your response makes that impossible
Jani 2025-06-20 05:23 p.m.
Ryan
Jani 2025-06-20 05:24 p.m.
you realise I do not play the game.
ryan 2025-06-20 05:24 p.m.
Okay and?
Jani 2025-06-20 05:24 p.m.
That yn aint getting money lol
ryan 2025-06-20 05:24 p.m.
I do not give a crap
ryan 2025-06-20 05:24 p.m.
That's fine
ryan 2025-06-20 05:24 p.m.
But you have to resolve this
Jani 2025-06-20 05:24 p.m.
I dont have to do crap
ryan 2025-06-20 05:24 p.m.
I understand
Jani 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
have put already too much time into a roblox court case that is based off of an 18 second clip
ryan 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
Okay well hire a lawyer then
Jani 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
how abt we use some brains in this court for once
ryan 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
Because I am also stuck with this
Jani 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
i am the lawyer
Jani 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
Im telling you to formulate a judgment.
ryan 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
You're not doing a very good job
Jani 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
I am
JaniIm telling you to formulate a judgment.
ryan 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
Which I can't do
Jani 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
have won every motion until now
ryan 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
Based off your pleading
Jani 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
my plea is not liable.
Janihave won every motion until now
ryan 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
Because James is stupid, doesn't make you good
Jani 2025-06-20 05:25 p.m.
lol
Janimy plea is not liable.
ryan 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
And your pleasing in response
ryan 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
Pleading*
ryan 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
Means i can't make a judgement without a trial
ryan 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
Where we fact find
Jani 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
Ryan, you a cool dude
ryan 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
Unless you want to change that
Jani 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
so what needs to be changed?
ryan 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
Your response to the civil complaint
Jani 2025-06-20 05:26 p.m.
what part
ryan 2025-06-20 05:27 p.m.
You need to concede facts as true
ryan 2025-06-20 05:27 p.m.
To some degree
ryan 2025-06-20 05:27 p.m.
So that only a question of law remains
Jani 2025-06-20 05:28 p.m.
but none is true of his claims
Jani 2025-06-20 05:28 p.m.
literally zero
Jani 2025-06-20 05:28 p.m.
since when cant we swear
ryan 2025-06-20 05:28 p.m.
Idk
ryan 2025-06-20 05:29 p.m.
Not my rule
Janiliterally zero
ryan 2025-06-20 05:29 p.m.
Well then I can't make a judgement on the pleadings
Jani 2025-06-20 05:29 p.m. 
ryan 2025-06-20 05:29 p.m.
Which means your motion is denied
ryan 2025-06-20 05:29 p.m.
Yea that is automod not me
Jani 2025-06-20 05:29 p.m.
alr then we gon drag it
Jani 2025-06-20 05:29 p.m.
good night
ryan 2025-06-20 05:29 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-06-20 05:30 p.m.
Until you're willing to schedule
Jani 2025-06-20 05:30 p.m.
Motion to Dismiss
ryan 2025-06-20 05:30 p.m.
Grounds
Jani 2025-06-20 05:30 p.m.
Because Area51woohoo is g ay
ryan 2025-06-20 05:31 p.m.
Denied
Jani 2025-06-20 05:31 p.m.
Because the video evidence provided shows clear reasonable doubt, doesnt show truly what happened and the claims that were listed are unfactual
Jani 2025-06-20 05:31 p.m.
wait use this ^^
ryan 2025-06-20 05:31 p.m.
It's not about reasonable doubt
ryan 2025-06-20 05:31 p.m.
It's a preponderance of evidence
Jani 2025-06-20 05:31 p.m.
James is never ever proving his case
Jani 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
since there is no evidence
Jani 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
for example
Jani 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
imagine area killed 5 people 10 seconds before this clip
Jani 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
then fled and got shot dead
Jani 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
but he only recorded the last 18 seconds.
ryan 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
That's an issue for trial / fact finding
Jani 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
it isnt
ryan 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
Not dismissal where you have to take claims in the civil complaint as true
ryan 2025-06-20 05:32 p.m.
Yes it is
Jani 2025-06-20 05:33 p.m.
how abt we actually have clerks review the evidence before they proceed to give it an actual case(edited)
Jani 2025-06-20 05:33 p.m.
this court doesnt have a filter
Jani 2025-06-20 05:34 p.m.
ngl im gonna sue area15 and just add a clip of my dog eating as evidence, and it will pass too
Jani 2025-06-20 05:34 p.m.
braindead community ngl
Jani 2025-06-20 05:34 p.m.
So again
Jani 2025-06-20 05:35 p.m.
Motion to dismiss, based off of unfactual statements and lack of evidence
Jani 2025-06-20 05:35 p.m.
now rule on it.
Janingl im gonna sue area15 and just add a clip of my dog eating as evidence, and it will pass too
Jani 2025-06-20 05:36 p.m.
you my dawg @huddy.
ryan 2025-06-20 05:38 p.m.
How about you stop bitching and choose one of the options I've given you
Jani 2025-06-20 05:38 p.m.
nobody bitching
Jani 2025-06-20 05:38 p.m.
I gave you the option
Jani 2025-06-20 05:38 p.m.
and easy one as well
Jani 2025-06-20 05:39 p.m.
so whats it gonna be?
ryan 2025-06-20 05:43 p.m.
No it's impossible
ryan 2025-06-20 05:43 p.m.
It's going to be you choose one of MY options
ryan 2025-06-20 05:44 p.m.
Or you'll go to jail indefinitely
ryan 2025-06-20 05:44 p.m.
Which doesn't do much but
ryan 2025-06-20 05:44 p.m.
If you want this resolved you need to cooperate
ryan 2025-06-20 05:44 p.m.
If not it'll never be resolved
Jani 2025-06-20 05:45 p.m.
I aint gonna put more time into this
Jani 2025-06-20 05:45 p.m.
truly
Jani 2025-06-20 05:45 p.m.
im not touching my document to adapt it
Jani 2025-06-20 05:45 p.m.
so yall can move on
Jani 2025-06-20 05:45 p.m.
I just said motion to dismiss
Jani 2025-06-20 05:45 p.m.
now wait for what james says and rule on it
ryan 2025-06-20 05:51 p.m.
I don't need to
ryan 2025-06-20 05:51 p.m.
It's denied
Jani 2025-06-20 05:52 p.m.
alr then
Jani 2025-06-20 05:52 p.m.
gl ladies
Jani 2025-06-20 05:52 p.m.
hit me with the next fine
ryan 2025-06-20 05:52 p.m.
No fine
Jani 2025-06-20 05:53 p.m.
send me to el salvador papi
ryan 2025-06-20 05:53 p.m.
Eventually I'll just rule against you
ryan 2025-06-20 05:53 p.m.
But my father told me to never negotiate with drunks, women, or stupid people
ryan 2025-06-20 05:53 p.m.
So negotiations end here
Jani 2025-06-20 05:53 p.m.
Jani 2025-06-20 05:54 p.m.
Ryan calm down yn
Jani 2025-06-20 05:54 p.m.
you my son and yk it
Jani 2025-06-20 05:54 p.m.
Im unc of the courts
ryan 2025-06-21 01:45 a.m.@huddy. let's start trial immediately
ryan 2025-06-21 01:46 a.m.
You have 24 hours to deliver an opening statement.
huddy. 2025-06-21 01:46 a.m.
Alright
huddy. 2025-06-21 01:46 a.m.
I'm home soon
ryan 2025-06-21 06:20 p.m.@huddy.
ryan 2025-06-21 06:28 p.m.@huddy.
Jani 2025-06-22 01:07 p.m.
LMAOO
Jani 2025-06-22 01:07 p.m.
thats 24 hours gone
Jani 2025-06-22 01:09 p.m.@ryan
Jani 2025-06-22 01:30 p.m.
How abt we do consider that motion to dismiss
Jani 2025-06-22 01:30 p.m.
has been buIIshit all along
huddy. 2025-06-22 03:00 p.m.
LMAOOO JAMESMHAMILTON DIDN'T RESPOND IN 24 HOURS BUT I ABANDONED THIS CASE FOR FOURTEEN DAYS AND THEN CALLED EVERYONE STUPID
huddy. 2025-06-22 03:01 p.m.
Your Honor, this case is a simple one.
Defendant abused his powers as a law enforcement officer to mercillesly murder the Plaintiff without any justification. While playing under the guise that he was merely protecting the safety of the public from Plaintiff, no evidence will be brought during this trial that will depict Plaintiff as a threat to public safety or warranting death. The only evidence brought forward will show Defendant as the so called 'protector of public safety', posing himself as a threat to it.
Defendant abused his powers as a law enforcement officer to mercillesly murder the Plaintiff without any justification. While playing under the guise that he was merely protecting the safety of the public from Plaintiff, no evidence will be brought during this trial that will depict Plaintiff as a threat to public safety or warranting death. The only evidence brought forward will show Defendant as the so called 'protector of public safety', posing himself as a threat to it.
Jani 2025-06-22 03:41 p.m.
dont think you have the right to speak atm.
ryan 2025-06-22 03:44 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-06-22 03:44 p.m.@Jani you have 24 hours to issue an opening statement
Jani 2025-06-22 03:44 p.m.
Negative sir.
ryan 2025-06-22 03:44 p.m.
You yield okay
Jani 2025-06-22 03:44 p.m.
You just failed to uphold your own rules.
ryan 2025-06-22 03:44 p.m.@Jani begin your presentation of evidence
Jani 2025-06-22 03:45 p.m.
I declare a mistrial.
JaniYou just failed to uphold your own rules.
ryan 2025-06-22 03:45 p.m.
If you keep interrupting, I will remove you from this channel and you will be made to speak in a chambers channel
JaniI declare a mistrial.
ryan 2025-06-22 03:45 p.m.
You can't do that.
Jani 2025-06-22 03:46 p.m.
How come, you just failed normal procedure in court.
ryan 2025-06-22 03:46 p.m.
Because the decision to declare a mistrial does not reside with you.
ryan 2025-06-22 03:46 p.m.
It resides with me.
Jani 2025-06-22 03:46 p.m.
Well then I urge you to declare it.
ryanryan 2025-06-22 03:46 p.m.@huddy. You may begin*
ryan 2025-06-22 03:46 p.m.
Denied
Jani 2025-06-22 03:47 p.m.
This trial just violated standard procedure and you deny to declare a mistrial?
Jani 2025-06-22 03:47 p.m.
Is that what I am hearing?
ryan used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-22 03:48 p.m. @ryan has removed @Jani from the case channel.
Case Modified
huddy. 2025-06-22 04:07 p.m.
We call Plaintiff to the stand
ryan used /administeroath
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-22 06:15 p.m.@songo (edited)Which type of oath would you like to swear to?
Religious - Involves swearing to god that your testimony is, or will be, truthful.
Non-Religious - Solemnly affirms that your testimony is, or will be, truthful, under the pains and penalties of perjury. Religious Oath Non-Religious Oath
Oath Selection
songo 2025-06-22 06:15 p.m.
Hello
BotclerkFlowclerkFlow Bot2025-06-22 06:15 p.m.@songo Do you solemnly affirm that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, under the pains and penalties of perjury?
Non-Religious Oath
songo 2025-06-22 06:15 p.m.
Yes
songo 2025-06-22 06:15 p.m.
A heads up would've been nice
songo 2025-06-22 06:15 p.m.
Kinda making food rn
ryan 2025-06-22 06:16 p.m.
Meh
ryan 2025-06-22 06:16 p.m.
You don't need to do it immediately
ryan 2025-06-22 06:16 p.m.
Just response to stuff w/in 24 hours
songo 2025-06-22 06:20 p.m.
Did Jani leave the server or is my discord broken
ryan 2025-06-22 06:53 p.m.
@kozjani
ryan 2025-06-22 06:53 p.m.
Yup
huddy. 2025-06-23 04:05 a.m.@ryan May I begin
ryan 2025-06-23 04:05 a.m.
Yes
ryan 2025-06-23 04:06 a.m.
I shall summon him and beckon him back.
huddy. 2025-06-23 04:06 a.m.@songo Howdy, please state your name for the record.
songo 2025-06-23 04:55 a.m.
Area51WooHoo
songoArea51WooHoo
huddy. 2025-06-23 05:44 a.m.
And what is your relation to this case?
songo 2025-06-23 07:58 a.m.
I am the plaintiff
songoI am the plaintiff
huddy. 2025-06-23 01:07 p.m.@songo Where were you on the 28th of February, 2025?
songo 2025-06-23 03:45 p.m.
Mersea in front of the car dealership
huddy. 2025-06-23 05:25 p.m.
Were you in your vehicle?
songo 2025-06-24 05:40 p.m.
I was in my vehicle
ryan 2025-06-25 03:04 p.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-25 05:00 p.m.@songo What vehicle was that?
songo 2025-06-25 05:58 p.m.
My red Tokai Estime
huddy. 2025-06-28 04:28 a.m.
Why were you there?
ryan 2025-06-30 04:47 a.m.@songo
ryan 2025-06-30 04:47 a.m.@huddy. @songo You have 3 more days to figure this out or youll cede the witness
ryansongo 2025-06-30 06:05 a.m.
What?
songo 2025-06-30 06:05 a.m.
The person I'm sueing ditched court
huddy. 2025-06-30 09:50 a.m.
Ok
songoThe person I'm sueing ditched court
ryan 2025-06-30 11:39 p.m.
Idgaf
ryan 2025-06-30 11:39 p.m.
We are at trial
ryan 2025-06-30 11:39 p.m.
and yall are taking too long
songo 2025-06-30 11:55 p.m.
My boy I've been one of the most persistent people here over this
ryan 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
i know
songo 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
I ALSO have things to do outside of the video game so I can't always respond in time
ryan 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
so wrap it up
ryan 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
I get that too
ryan 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
i check discord like once a day
ryan 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
but this is out of hand
huddy.Why were you there?
songo 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
I was in Mersea
songo 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
Out of hand
ryan 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
it was out of hand the monent kozjani appeared
songo 2025-06-30 11:56 p.m.
Was it out of hand when the other guy delayed 2 months cause he said this is pointless
ryan 2025-06-30 11:57 p.m.
most definitely
songoI was in Mersea
huddy. 2025-07-01 07:59 a.m.
Did you leave the car dealership?
songo 2025-07-01 01:39 p.m.
Yeah I'm pretty sure
huddy. 2025-07-04 04:31 a.m.
Where did you go next?
songo 2025-07-09 03:54 a.m.
was shot
ryan 2025-07-10 01:11 a.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-07-10 04:28 p.m.
When did you first encounter Defendant?
ryan 2025-07-21 01:04 a.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-07-21 01:05 a.m.@huddy. You will lose your right to examine your witness at this time.
ryan 2025-07-21 01:05 a.m.
Please move onto your next
UserMessage could not be loaded.
ryan 2025-07-22 02:17 a.m.
ryan 2025-07-22 02:17 a.m.
The same applies here.
Xerxy 2025-08-13 03:12 p.m.
Reassigned to mag @Ocazius
Xerxy used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 03:18 p.m. @Xerxy has added @Ocazius to the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:20 p.m.@huddy. Why are you not continuing your questioning?
Ocazius 2025-08-13 04:03 p.m.
@kozjani
Ocazius 2025-08-13 04:04 p.m.
It seems the defendant has quit clark county
Ocazius 2025-08-13 07:12 p.m.
Kozjani is unable to be contacted, deciding to flee the state mid-suit.
Ocazius 2025-08-13 07:12 p.m.
Thus, he will be held in contempt for delaying these proceedings.
huddy. 2025-08-15 05:31 p.m.@Ocazius cant you put him in jail forever
huddy. 2025-08-15 05:31 p.m.
cuz he quit
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:34 p.m.
Not yet, allow me some time to review.
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:35 p.m.@ian Did Kozjani reach out to you regarding representing him? I believe he is being sued as a county law enforcement officer.
Ocazius used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-15 05:45 p.m. @Ocazius has added @ian to the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:45 p.m.@ian
Ocaziusian 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
No
ian 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
And to me it seems he's being sued in his individual capacity
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
Could have just told me that in chatroom 
ian 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
Solely
ian 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
There's no OFMC tort
OcaziusCould have just told me that in chatroom
ian 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
True
ian 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
But I want to elaborate
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
So you do not wish to represent him in his absence?
ian 2025-08-15 05:47 p.m.
If this is truly an official capacity suit then it warrants dismissal
OcaziusSo you do not wish to represent him in his absence?
ian 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
It depends
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
It is not official capacity from what I understand.
ian 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
On the capacity under which he is sued
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
I believe he previously sought the SGO's defense but it was denied.
OcaziusIt is not official capacity from what I understand.
ian 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
Then no, I can't because he needs to consent to my representation
ian 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
And he hasn't
ian 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
Since he left the server, I understand he is not going to
ian 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
If he wishes to ask me in the future I will review the case and conclude
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:49 p.m.
I simply reached out as I am not sure on the policy of the County Solicitor's office on who to represent, and whether or not you represent people privately too.
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:49 p.m.
Thank you for confirming.
Ocazius used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-15 05:49 p.m. @Ocazius has removed @ian from the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:49 p.m.@huddy. @songo
Ocazius 2025-08-15 05:49 p.m.
I will make a decision on this shortly.
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-30 02:13 a.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Volume XII
profile used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-04 10:26 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-04 10:26 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1446341960775368765 Successfully created transcript.
Exported 976 messages